Holy CRAP is that sucker heavy. But of course, now that I've played with it, I don't WANT the lighter f/4.0 version. It doesn't seem as heavy as it did when it arrived... is that possible? Though, I do fear immediate carpal tunnel.
If you own this lens, or even if you don't but have an opinion, I'd LOVE to hear from you. =) It's a big investment for someone like me, and since I'm stepping up my game this summer, I figure it's the next lens to add to my kit. It might (?) be important to note that I do NOT own the 24-70. If that affects your answer. This would come in very handy for many aspects of my business...
Here are some (totally and completely) random and probably not that interesting shots I took with it on Saturday.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0dae2/0dae23e88c941e041ccd0d20309c18cc089a4578" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b3cc6/b3cc64e61340aff5668421a49c6e1a2727f9397a" alt=""
Hmmm... maybe more interesting in black and white?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f4e84/f4e848047fb799d9ceb39c10cf918029d589e48a" alt=""
Wheeee!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b57e3/b57e31a5e3b81795d728256c4e0ea26d7514f89a" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d68c4/d68c4619e85b771aadbca07f052fd369f3c1b3eb" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a0867/a08672c318b0ece1dc0955a7135ac0ff0f25e545" alt=""
OK, again, not exactly interesting, but I'm in love with this lens.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c5bdc/c5bdc2d92e0d0dd7b027d001d8fef6edb94739ae" alt=""
These are on my house...
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3c1f2/3c1f258d3e7612583e8bfbe940f323cdeca2e6ee" alt=""
This didn't turn out as I had envisioned, bit still sorta fun...
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ad36d/ad36de3b3de15a2952308dd9b9c37bfde9ea4706" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a4d06/a4d06d3a6bfe4247f4c886fc01f8bc693a2a8ee6" alt=""
Off to catch up on life. I'm behind everywhere and on everything having been at Mystic 4 for two days and gone back to work today! =)
Tons of gorgeous shots, Julia!! I own the 24-70 and the 70-200 f/2.8 IS. Would be happy to talk shop with you...Too much to type...
ReplyDeleteI own the same as Eileen and love both....but especially the 70-200. I would say it's worth every penny - it rocks! And yes it is heavy and yes you do get used to it....sort of :)
ReplyDeletegreat shots! as always! i am pretty sure i have given you my thoughts on the 70-200 before, but if not... i will tell you again. i think you need it! i couldn't go back to doing weddings without it. it isn't my most used lens, but i use it during ceremonies the most, and SHOULD use it more. you definitely want the 2.8 if you are going to use it in available light. i think it is sharper and the depth of feild seems better than with the 24-70, but maybe that is just me. definitely worth it!
ReplyDeleteNot interesting my foot!
ReplyDeleteGORGEOUS shots!
No idea on the lens, but now I want it lol
LOVE the boxes one (both color & black and white) but I have ask - why no Grover shots? SERIOUSLY?
CRAP! Onna! LOL... I DID have a Grover one! I forgot to paste it. =) Hee hee! Oh well... guess he'll get his own post.
ReplyDeleteThank you guys for all the tips. :)